justira ([personal profile] justira) wrote2001-05-29 01:11 am

no, women are NOT female!!!!

random observation-thingy:

it is interesting how clothing styles cycle between going "NO! women are NOT female! no breasts! no hips! no legs! NOOOO!" and "women have female parts! WOW! look, see here they are!"

(yes, i'm clothesbrowsing on ebay again. too much fun)

[identity profile] damienden.livejournal.com 2001-05-28 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
:D Okay; right now, do women have female parts or not? I can't really tell, hiding behind my computer and in dark cold computer rooms from which I forbid me self to go ebay hopping..

[identity profile] justira.livejournal.com 2001-05-28 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
http://www.style.com/vogue/talkfash/051001/index.html

does the lady in black answer your question?

[identity profile] damienden.livejournal.com 2001-05-29 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)
perhaps, possibly.. I thikn she's showing, with the fact that she's wearing only a strip of fabric as a top.. so yes, she has shoulders, and a belly, and arms, and all of the other things generally associated with a normal healthy person.. and some things not so associated, like the heels, and the fact that she seems to be carrying her name around like a little suitcase..

[identity profile] duien.livejournal.com 2001-05-30 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
and some fashions are really silly and say look! women have female parts. see, see! but we won't show them to you! haha! so there!